Should an agency let clients go to grow?
Some, carefully. The small historic clients that took far more time than they were worth were moved to agencies better suited to them, which freed the team for work that fitted.
Blog
Often, yes. An agency that has gone flat usually got there by chasing every piece of work, which spreads the team thin and leaves it known for nothing in particular. The agency I worked with had been flat for three years. It turned round by committing to one focus, moving existing clients onto retainers and letting go of small clients that cost more time than they earned. Pitch conversion rose, more than half of turnover came from long-term clients, and a larger agency made an offer to buy it.
Because an agency that tries to be everything to everyone ends up good at nothing in particular, and that is fatal in a market full of specialists. When turnover and profit go flat, the instinct is to chase harder: say yes to everything, pitch for anything, take any client who will pay. It feels responsible, and it is usually what keeps the agency where it is.
Every scattered project pulls the team in a different direction. Quality slips, margins thin, and the busyness hides the fact that the business is not moving. The agency I worked with had been flat on turnover and profit for three years, with work that had started to feel joyless and owners who did not know what to do next.
It started with a review that told the owners something they did not want to hear: the agency had to stop trying to do everything and commit to one thing it would be known for. Three changes followed.
The agency went after larger projects that fitted it, instead of a scatter of small ones. It put existing clients onto proper retainers, so income could be planned rather than chased every month. And it let go, carefully, of the small historic clients that drained far more time than they were worth, moving them to agencies better suited to them and freeing the team for work that mattered.
Each of those removed something, and the business grew because of it.
Pitch conversion climbed, because the agency competed only for work it was right for. More than half of turnover came from long-term clients, so income steadied. Profitability recovered as the focus took hold. Then a larger agency, looking at that profitability and the strength of the client relationships, made an offer to buy it.
Related evidence: How a struggling agency lifted pitch conversion 40% and got acquired. Earlier in this journey: The hidden cost in your agency's pitch process.
Some, carefully. The small historic clients that took far more time than they were worth were moved to agencies better suited to them, which freed the team for work that fitted.
They turn income into something that can be planned rather than chased every month. By the end, more than half of this agency's turnover came from long-term clients, and the buyer looked at the strength of those relationships.
Most clients begin with a conversation. No pitch, no hard sell.
Just a straightforward discussion about where you are and whether I can help.
Book a free 30-minute call