Case study
A firm that thought its website converted at 2% was really at 0.4%. I built the strategy to fix it.
Halo Financial, a foreign exchange and international money transfer firm, believed its website converted visitors at nearly 2%. My audit found that once a mis-attributed internal referral was stripped out, the real figure was 0.4%, with mobile close to zero. I turned that hard truth into a full digital strategy and the brief for a responsive rebuild.
- Sector
- Financial services — foreign exchange
- Work
- Digital health analysis · Digital strategy
- Period
- Circa 2014
What was the problem?
Halo was established and busy, but its website was quietly underperforming, and the team could not see it clearly because the measurement itself was broken. Traffic looked healthy, conversion looked acceptable, and nobody quite trusted the numbers. They were heading towards spending real money on a rebuild without an honest picture of what was actually wrong, which is the most expensive way to start a project.
What did I do?
I ran a full digital audit across the whole estate before recommending a single change. Analytics, PPC, hosting, SEO, the website itself, social media, the competitor set, the audience, email, an offline collateral review, and a customer survey to hear it from the clients directly. Then I turned the findings into a strategy the business could act on.
The findings were blunt. The apparent 1.93% conversion rate was propped up by a single internal referral from a sister domain that was recording a 31.9% conversion; take that out and the true site conversion was 0.4%, against an internet median nearer 4%. Mobile was being ignored, with more than 38% of visitors on phones and tablets converting at 0.11% against 0.31% on desktop. The measurement was broken in ways that mattered: email traffic was untracked, AdWords was not linked to analytics, goals were not firing on the thank-you pages, and the PPC numbers disagreed with each other depending on which report you read. The SEO foundations were shaky, with more than 1,500 duplicate page titles and a backlink profile dominated by "friendly" links from sister sites, an old blog alone pushing over 1,700 sidebar links. Social looked busy at 5,450 followers but sent fewer than 2% of them to the site. And the site itself was cluttered and dated, with forms so long and a sign-up CAPTCHA so broken that one page was seeing 75% abandonment.
From there I built the strategy. SMART objectives and KPIs, a phased action plan from quick wins through to long-term work, a content plan, four customer personas, and a clear technical direction: a responsive rebuild with marketing given control of the site and separated from the secure account area, a proper CMS evaluation weighing the in-house .NET options against faster PHP ones, fixed and trustworthy tracking, and a simpler two-stage account-opening flow.
What was the result?
The deliverable was clarity and a plan the business could act on: an honest baseline of 0.4% rather than the comforting 2%, a prioritised roadmap, and a brief a rebuild could actually be built from. I went on to lead the search for the agency to build it and to project-manage the full build, and those are separate stories. The post-launch performance figures belong with that build, so I have kept this piece to what the audit and the strategy delivered rather than borrowing numbers from the next chapter.